Not really. But at least
they discuss the ultimate RISC.
Anyway, I've been making a list of the ultimate programming paradigms. Everything is a(n): (carefully sorted alphabetically so you don't feel they are prioritized)
- actor (Erlang)
- algorithm (Python)
- application (iPhone)
- argument (like for a method)
- array (Lisp)
- aspect (AspectJ)
- associative array (JavaScript)
- capability (E)
- code (Lisp)
- component (XPCOM)
- concept (CoP)
- constraint (Prolog)
- coroutine
- data (Lisp)
- delegate (C#)
- documentation (Perl)
- DSL
- enumeration
- environment (bash)
- event (Reactive programming)
- file (GNU/Linux)
- filter
- function (lambda calculus)
- generator
- graph
- Lisp (Lisp)
- list (Lisp)
- macro (Lisp)
- map
- message (Smalltalk)
- module (Ada)
- monad (Haskell)
- object (Smalltalk)
- operator (C++)
- package (Java)
- paradigm
- pattern
- picture
- platform (Java/Mono/CLR/LLVM/Parrot)
- procedure (BASIC)
- program
- prototype (says the entrepreneur)
- query (SQL)
- reference (C)
- rule (Prolog)
- stack
- stream (pLucid)
- string (Tcl)
- syntax sugar (Perl)
- table (SQL)
- template (C++)
- TeX (TeX)
- text (TeX)
- transaction (SQL)
- tree (Lisp)
- type
- value (first-class programming)
- variable
- white box
I also came up with a list of adjectives. Everything is:
- abstract
- Algol-like
- annotated
- cross-platform
- easy (once you know how)
- encapsulated
- explicit
- generic
- high-level
- incomplete
- large
- local
- (un?)provable
- pure
- resource-limited
- scripted
Anyway, expect a post for each one of these eventually.
No comments:
Post a Comment